Make your own using our Graph Builder or upload your own files, images or videos. All our charts are user-submitted.
« Previous Probability of Calling Someone a Genius | CHANCE OF REMEMBERING TO TAKE OUT THE TRASH Next »
Make your own using our Graph Builder or upload your own files, images or videos. All our charts are user-submitted.
« Previous Probability of Calling Someone a Genius | CHANCE OF REMEMBERING TO TAKE OUT THE TRASH Next »
I think you are referring to Lincoln Logs, not Legos.
definitly legos, why would lincoln logs be on your foot??????!?!?!?!
What if you move in to the childs room while the legos are embedded in your foot?
Graph fail !
I depends on whether your foot is hovering above the floor or actually touching the floor.
I was wondering about the “In Lego Box” part of the graph. According to the graph, it’s possible for the Legos to be in the Lego box AND not in the child’s room at the same time. Is the Lego box only half in the room? Or what? You know?
the lego box could always be in the living room, or any other room for that matter.
This hurts my logic bone.
Dude is your name really Todd or are you just unhealthily obsessed with Scrubs (and the most perverted character I personally have ever seen in a non-anime show)?
No, we have a sense of humor, you’re just not funny
Here are some apostrophes:
‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘
Please feel free to scatter them at will.
Thanks. I was running low on apostrophes.
That’s too many. They only need two. I’d rather they didn’t overuse them and give us something like “Lego’s”
omg, that was actually really clever. okay, so maybe you are a real man. lol.
I do believe those would be back-ticks, sir. Have an apostrophe:
‘
The plural of “Lego” is “Lego.” Please stop saying “Legos”!!!!!!!
Hey, even Microsoft underlines the word.
I have too many Legos to stop calling them that now.
the word lego is starting to look really weird to me
ogeL
the plural of “lego” is most definitely not “lego”. you know how i know this? when i was a kid, i had a whole frickin tub of LEGOS. with an “s”. so did many of my friends. legos are not deer, or salmon, or any other noun that is an exception to normal pluralization rules.
besides, “let’s go play with lego!” sounds like a suggestion from a poor kid.
It is, of course, Legos, with an “s”. If you don’t believe me, then what do you picture when I invite you to come over and play with my Lego? Do we simply look at it, or pass it back and forth? Because there’s obviously nothing for it to stick to (feet excepted).
The plural of lego is lego. If you want to use the letter s, then the plural would be “lego bricks”. The product is called Lego. Not Legos. Learn to english.
“Learn to English.”
LMAO.
Actually, it’s LEGO
No… the plural of “Lego” is “Legos” (although my Google Chrome spell-check seems to disagree.)
Wrong, it’s Legi.
LEGO is either the brand name or the group noun of their products, neither of which can be pluralised, the individual unit (i.e. the LEGO brick) can however be pluralised.
The Google corporation does indeed have better grammar than you.
This resembles my house, but I think the “embedded in my foot” circle needs to be bigger!!
*ow*
I really wish people would stop using my user name. I guess I’m not posting here anymore. Happy now, jerkface?
Quit using my username.
And yes, it is “Lego”
And I also wear dorky glasses, so what. I’m kinda a dork, so it fits.
Ignoring Venn diagram size fail, this is true. not funny, but true.
Funny is some of my cousin’s college buddies who built a naked Lego girl in their dorm. Ok, maybe that’s just sick and twisted.
Was she anatomically correct?
Stop using my name!!!!
It’s not Legos. It’s not Lego. It’s Lego bricks.
I am from Lagos, I play with Legos. Also, Leggos my eggos!
I object. As a child, I kept my Legos(pronounced Leh-gos, not Lay-goes) organized.
Does this mean the lego box is located partly inside and partly outside the child’s room?
Please stop using venn diagrams to picture quantities. Only the logic relations of the sets are relevant.
What SHOULD Venn diagrams be used for? Asking sincerely, not sarcastically
illustrating commonalities between two distinct groups or categories.
and i agree – this would have been better as a pie chart.
1. Lego is more than just bricks. The bricks are the cheapest and interchangeable … But the tiny Star Wars figures break the bank, (and a kindergarteners’ mood when they disappear).
2. Consider adding two other ‘relationship’ circles:
a. the Lego which disappeared in the vacuum cleaner, and
b. the Lego which disappeared while ‘on loan’ to friends
So, there are some legos that are in the lego box but not in the child’s room? Does the lego box stand halfway through his doorway?
Silly people, the graph CLEARLY shows that the box was in the doorway to the child’s room, was tipped over (ow, i stubbed my toe!), spilling the Lego(s) through the doorway into the hall. Then the perpetrator stepped in the pile with one foot, (ow, %$#&!) and is currently hopping on the OTHER foot (hence them not being on the floor).
* oh, and he’s hopping because it hurts to stand on poky Lego(s).
** not that I don’t like Lego()s, mind…
this graph is a total and utter fail. it’s embarrassing. vein diagram comprehension score: -2.
Vein diagram? Uhhh, FAIL.
What about multiple Lego boxes? I know that my boys have 1 in their room, 1 in the living room, 1 by their “work table”, and another one in my car (honestly have NO idea why it’s in there – but they keep telling me it has to stay in there). Then the Lego can be in the box, but not in the room.
That’s exactly what I was thinking. I know my daughter also has some in her room and some in the living room.
Well, then it should be “In Lego boxes”.
Yes, that would make more sense.
Look up at your photo on the Most Wanted List. Rather, most wanted
jerk list.
Oooh, Todd’s come out! Stop screaming, girls, it’s the boys he wants!
(I wear slippers just so’s I don’t get Lego embedded in my foot)
If you go to http://www.legos.com you get redirected to lego.com because Legos is not a word!
*sigh*
If I were the king of the world, people who couldn’t construct a proper Venn diagram wouldn’t be allowed to HAVE kids.
Are people ACTUALLY having a conversation on the proper usage of Lego as if it is a word in the language? Really? Lego is, indeed, a product name. You can say Lego, Legos, Legotastic, Legotomy, it really doesn’t matter. If Lego is a created corporate name there is no correct or incorrect usage. Wow.
Also, as a kid, I can’t imagine this conversation:
“You want to play with Legos?”
“Excuse me, my young lad friend, but the correct usage is ‘Lego Bricks’, so no. I will now go be with folk that employ proper usage of this corporate trademark! Good day, sir!”
“But it’s just a toy that…”
“I said ‘Good Day’!”
(Oh, crud. I just fell victim to the trolls, didn’t I?)
Seems like a US/UK difference?
USA say legos, UK say lego
since lego is a danish co. perhaps the danes know how to pluralise it.
Kat : katte.
Hus : huse.
Brev : breve.
Therefore, Lego -> Legge.
It’s Lego. Not “Lego’s” you English twisting bastard. That’s like saying Fish’s, or Sheep’s.
Learn how to do a graph, the try to be funny
What, only part of the Lego box stays in the child’s room? Do you leave it halfway through the door?
so only 1/4 of the lego box is in their room?
Can also substitute Lego for Hotwheels and Matchbox cars quite easily. Some of those have rather sharp bits. Place a few dozen in a dark hallway on the way to the bathroom and use your imagination.