Comments on: The Future

By: danielle

danielle — Mon, 15 Feb 2010 15:45:52 +0000

i dont understand why that car would need wheels. unless it was a fancy 2-in-one type

By: Jakob

Jakob — Mon, 30 Nov 2009 17:37:25 +0000

x is time, y is predicted time of flying cars.

By: PirateFaafy

PirateFaafy — Sat, 24 Oct 2009 08:34:08 +0000

Actually, this is pretty intriguing, as the trends themselves are pretty constant and not perfectly parallel; theoretically, one could extrapolate the lines until they have a point of intersection to determine when the current date equals the date predicted. That is, the date when they will exist.

By: that guy

that guy — Wed, 09 Sep 2009 15:38:34 +0000

Wow this should be on failblog.

The red line shouldn’t be there. It should be the x-axis. And it would still be not funny.

By: RepMan

RepMan — Fri, 24 Jul 2009 19:33:19 +0000

How about this…
X-axis: Year
Y-axis: Number of years until we have flying cars

Graph: Horizontal line at ~20 years

By: CAPM

CAPM — Tue, 21 Jul 2009 16:27:56 +0000

Predicted date you mom gave me head – today

By: scarecrow

scarecrow — Thu, 09 Jul 2009 05:17:03 +0000

Is his mom hot? Cause that wouldn’t be so bad then… XD

By: Mr. Dude

Mr. Dude — Tue, 30 Jun 2009 20:53:38 +0000

there are flying cars. i read it on the wallstreet journal. the problem is that you need one hell of a liscense and its inconvienient to go to an airport and back to to get from home to work.

By: re:Actually

re:Actually — Tue, 30 Jun 2009 14:32:51 +0000

haha

By: slaggingham

slaggingham — Mon, 29 Jun 2009 23:24:58 +0000

Also true about Fusion Power.

By: Alex

Alex — Mon, 29 Jun 2009 20:27:55 +0000

As do I.

By: Alex

Alex — Mon, 29 Jun 2009 20:26:36 +0000

True, but you can basically infer one off the red line and the Y-axis.

And you must admit, it IS pretty funny.

By: jackie31337

jackie31337 — Mon, 29 Jun 2009 11:09:11 +0000

And it should not be a straight line. It should be exponential or logarithmic or something, either with predicted date getting further away from actual date (likely) or closer (I don’t think we’re ever going to have flying cars. We drive badly enough on the ground as it is.)

By: kat

kat — Mon, 29 Jun 2009 04:18:04 +0000

this is a terrible graph, and doesn’t make any sense. what’s on the x axis? cuz otherwise, these things are happening on the same date.

By: nobody

nobody — Sun, 28 Jun 2009 21:21:25 +0000

According to Wikipedia, flying cars have been around since like the 1930’s.

By: Roscoe

Roscoe — Sun, 28 Jun 2009 09:29:59 +0000

Agree with critics. This graph is incomplete.

By: Jeff

Jeff — Sun, 28 Jun 2009 08:54:27 +0000

Out of curiosity, how would a flying car differ from a small airplane or a helicopter?

By: McFreddie

McFreddie — Sun, 28 Jun 2009 03:26:41 +0000

I agree

By: Andreas

Andreas — Sat, 27 Jun 2009 23:25:47 +0000

We have flying cars, they’re just not efficient enough to actually be useful to anyone.

By: Also Anonymous

Also Anonymous — Sat, 27 Jun 2009 22:36:23 +0000

Just imagine there are generic time labels.

By: dardub

dardub — Sat, 27 Jun 2009 21:50:11 +0000

Hmm.. I might have to freeze myself and ask to be thawed in 2100 then.

Hopefully the technology to bring a human back to life after being frozen will be invented by then as well. I think it follows the same graph as flying cars.

By: dardub

dardub — Sat, 27 Jun 2009 21:46:23 +0000

Same thing as commercial pilots now days.

By: dardub

dardub — Sat, 27 Jun 2009 21:45:08 +0000

I think it might be ironic if in 20 years they do finally invent a flying car, but it needs to run on a gasoline powered engine, and by then everyone will have switched to electric motor.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Sat, 27 Jun 2009 19:49:01 +0000

Graph does not work…has no label for X-Axis…

By: Poet

Poet — Sat, 27 Jun 2009 17:33:00 +0000

Not well made is a bit of an understatement, I’m afraid.

By: philip

philip — Sat, 27 Jun 2009 08:55:24 +0000

Predicted date you did stop talking to yourself – June 26 2009.

By: hera

hera — Sat, 27 Jun 2009 03:12:45 +0000

FAIL.

By: dontwantaname

dontwantaname — Sat, 27 Jun 2009 03:11:00 +0000

it looks like they might collide at like 2100!!

–sweet ^^

By: candlewax

candlewax — Sat, 27 Jun 2009 00:20:38 +0000

Due to the fact that Michael Jackson is 95% plastic, he will be melted down in lieu of burial and made into lego blocks so that little children can play with him for a change.

By: Atlantis

Atlantis — Sat, 27 Jun 2009 00:17:51 +0000

And how only people who can perform better criticize professional athletes.

By: calilac

calilac — Fri, 26 Jun 2009 23:59:46 +0000

you know those people who are getting ready to work while they drive? you know, the ones who are putting on make-up, drinking coffee, talking on the cell phone, and getting dressed all at once. do you really want them in control of a flying car? do. not. want!

By: Elfking

Elfking — Fri, 26 Jun 2009 21:41:46 +0000

Who would need a flying car if you had a underwater car?
Of course, there’s sky EVERYWHERE and the ocean is in select places, so it would be more efficient.
But, I would prefer an underwater car. Because…it’s and underwater car. No explanation needed.

By: dardub

dardub — Fri, 26 Jun 2009 21:05:03 +0000

Yes you’re right on.

By: dardub

dardub — Fri, 26 Jun 2009 21:02:49 +0000

Yeah its clever but not well made.

By: nishant

nishant — Fri, 26 Jun 2009 20:35:14 +0000

We actually have flying cars, just not for the general public

By: Skyshade13

Skyshade13 — Fri, 26 Jun 2009 20:19:06 +0000

Flying cars, pffff, how about small personal planes?

By: ferris

ferris — Fri, 26 Jun 2009 19:51:21 +0000

Hey Kodgetts, why don’t you pull the pole out of your ass?

By: Doc

Doc — Fri, 26 Jun 2009 19:49:03 +0000

It was lllooonnnggg!

By: CAPM

CAPM — Fri, 26 Jun 2009 19:47:09 +0000

I wish Captain Crunch were in that car…

By: CAPM

CAPM — Fri, 26 Jun 2009 19:45:53 +0000

Poser, that’s a little better.

By: sonofa

sonofa — Fri, 26 Jun 2009 19:34:32 +0000

The road thing is one of the many problems with the flying cars idea. People have enough difficulty and cause enough accidents in two dimensions–can you imagine trying to get them to drive well in three? Flying cars are just impractical, for many reasons. So yeah, we could totally have them, but it’s not worth it.

By: MK1K

MK1K — Fri, 26 Jun 2009 19:05:41 +0000

I think I heard that they already have flying cars, but flying roads would be too difficult/expensive.

By: martin

martin — Fri, 26 Jun 2009 18:45:52 +0000

Doc Brown said we’d have flying cars by 2015. And he said it in 1985, before showing Jennifer and Marty that he was telling the truth while simultaneously blowing Biff’s mind and making him question his own sexuality.

By: CAPM

CAPM — Fri, 26 Jun 2009 18:34:17 +0000

Poser, at least get some originality. Geez.

By: Akkhima

Akkhima — Fri, 26 Jun 2009 18:32:29 +0000

Of course, you have to make good graphs to be a graph critic, just like you have to actually make movies to be a movie critic!

By: Akkhima

Akkhima — Fri, 26 Jun 2009 18:30:43 +0000

I’m going to have to say no. What is the X Axis?

By: Ekid2k

Ekid2k — Fri, 26 Jun 2009 18:28:18 +0000

Does this graph have time plotted against time?

By: Captain Crunch

Captain Crunch — Fri, 26 Jun 2009 18:02:49 +0000

Predicted date I will get laid – never

By: actually

actually — Fri, 26 Jun 2009 18:00:23 +0000

Thanks.

By: Flint

Flint — Fri, 26 Jun 2009 17:59:40 +0000

X-axis should be current date, Y-axis should be expected flying cars date. There should only be one line on the graph.

It would have made more sense, but would have been less funny visually.