Make your own using our Graph Builder or upload your own files, images or videos. All our charts are user-submitted.
« Previous Music Popularity in school | Treadmill Speed of Guy Next to Me Next »
Make your own using our Graph Builder or upload your own files, images or videos. All our charts are user-submitted.
« Previous Music Popularity in school | Treadmill Speed of Guy Next to Me Next »
This describes my life exactly, but it would be better if you could get the “gay men” and “men in committed relationships” to overlap a little.
Wanna hook-up, catgirl? I promise I’ll call afterward….maybe.
welcome to the creeps and losers circle. *cheer*
penny lopey.
.
Sorry couldn’t help myself.
and maybe if “creeps and losers” were its own circle.
I have to wonder why she’s only met around 10% of the men she’s attracted to? Weeeiiiird!
Those are men she would be attracted to if she met them =P
Or celebrities.
My thoughts with an uncanny exactness.
Same here =\
Maybe she means the type of men she’s attracted to. That’s how I interpreted it.
i thought that it meant that there are people that shes never met, but has seen, that she was attracted to. also celebs
I would think that “Men to whom I am attracted” should be mostly engulfed by “Men whom I have ever met” myself.
Not really, you can be attracted to someone you’ve never met. Celebrities for example.
Wow, we did this at the exact same time. Lol.
No, because you can be attracted to a man without ever having met him. For instance, I am attracted to Johnny Depp, but my chances of ever meeting him are very slim indeed.
i hope your a girl
But there are men out there whom you WOULD be attracted to, but you haven’t met (because, geez, it’s a big world). I think that’s what it’s insinuating…
This is a factual graph that all woman can relate to.
cuz yall are a bunch of bitches, yo.
no i’m kidding, but if this graph is anyway to look at the world… no wonder that’s what you find in guys, nor why the nice cute attractive guys don’t like you.
Yes, but then again, there should be an overlap of just about everything, because gay men in committed relationships could be creeps and losers anyhoo.
Bit of a Venn diagram fail. You’ve not accounted for the vast proportion of men you’ve met, and wha’ts wrong with the bit where “Men to whom I am attracted” intersects with “men I’ve met”? Some of them are gay or in comitted relationships, but the rest?
The only clever bit is the green circle in the top left, because that’s a lulzy truism. Whoever said that “creeps and losers” needed its own circle is a moron who doesn’t understand the only bit of wit on the whole graph.
I’m taking this too seriously.
wha’ts wrong with the bit where “Men to whom I am attracted” intersects with “men I’ve met”? Some of them are gay or in comitted relationships, but the rest?
Not attracted to her, or didn’t work out, perhaps?
Yeah, I got that she’d met them and found them attractive but if they found her attractive they’d be in the green circle, which we can see doesn’t intersect.
I would think hot celebrity men qualify as “men to whom I am attracted” but have not met.
Yeah, there is a large area of otherwise un-categorized “men I have ever met” but that doesn’t make it a Venn diagram fail. Adding categories like co-workers, relatives, etc. would clutter up the thing and hide the lol-ness of the essential message which is basically that “men who are attracted to me” and “men to whom I am attracted” do not intersect. In addition, I would say the part of the set of “men who are attracted to me” that is outside “men I have ever met” could represent those nice boys who are too shy to introduce themselves to our future cat lady.
You know, I often tell people to lighten up with the criticism of graph technical errors, because this is a humor site, after all, but this one is so goofed up it’s hard to understand. It’s good idea that’s loaded with potential for humor, but the execution is just a bit weak.
her problem is that she’s soooo picky. she needs to be a cat lady since she finds so few of the men she has met attractive.
I think it’s an excellent graph just as it is – hardly “goofed up”. The proportions seem pretty accurate to me. And I have two cats already!
The proportions seem pretty accurate to you?
The way I read it she has meet about 1/3 of all gay men in the world. She has met about six times the number of men than there are gay men in the world.
I just think it’s a fallacy to assume that the “Creeps and losers” portion of this graph would never intersect the “Men in committed relationships” portion.
yes, you are taking it FAR too seriously.
I assumed that the “ever” in the gray circle was a typo of “never.” To me, “Men I have ever met” just doesn’t quite sound right. Why not “Men I have met?”
Please, correct me if I am wrong.
No, you’re right. Its necessarily wordy. Other than that I have no problems.
*unnecessarily*
and “It’s”
ah ha ! so here are two problems you didn’t think you had
The circle encompasses “all” as in “all the men I have ever met”.
The idea is cute, but yeah, this is a Venn fail. Sorry.
Very confusing.
Oh hush up all of you. *I* GET IT!! And whoever made this, I can totally relate. I’m off to get my cats right now.
LOL Yeah, I snagged this for my blog. I’m well on my way to crazy cat lady status. I’d be further along if I could have pets (my kitties live with my dad D: )
This graph is mean
You a disgruntled suitor?
This graph could be replaced with “I am ugly.” I’d think That pretty much sums up everything
Oh yes, because the only reason a girl can’t get a guy is because she’s ugly. There are absolutely no other factors involving anyone else in a relationship. /sarcasm
Yeah, she could be fat too.
I’m a model and a medical student, yet this still sums up my life. Haha how sad…..
No doubt – you probably intimidate the hell out of most men!
Haha how sad
I’ve seen plenty of fat ugly women with men.
I think I”m going with the Picky category. If you’re attracted to people who don’t acknowledge your existance…and all the people who are attracted to you, you can’t stand…
Then you’re looking out of your league. Its a sad but true commentary on the nature of humans and attraction. I know a guy is normal looking, comes from a moderately poor family. He’s a talented guy and very intelligent. He is dead set on finding a super hot very rich girl. What he doesn’t realize is that the vast majority are spoiled rotten and they know he cannot (possibly ever) give them the life daddy has…so they’re waiting for the better looking richer guy.
Hes going to end up being an old cat guy (i think men turn into dirty old men *shrug*)…and not because he couldn’t find someone decent…
That’s so sad. If I were single or knew any single ladies…
you should just look over the yellow, red and purple circle.
they serve no purpose
Pretty sure they explain why some of the men she has met are not ideal. The problem, if you ask me, and I know you didn’t, is the part of the “men i have ever met” circle that doesn’t intersect with anything else. Is it an empty set? If so, cool.
the red does to serve a purpose. it shows that no men that she is attracted to are attracted to her. As for the other two, basically they show that she is attracted to some gay an relationshiped (?) men. I think that this graph is fine and awesome.
Why take it so seriously? This isn’t science. It’s fun.
Heh, post it here and suddenly, it’s no longer fun.
What are you talking about? Science IS fun.
I get it, but there’s one BIG one missing: men who have no interest in me or commitments. Sorry, but I’ve learned my lesson, and I see it being repeated again and again.
I’m 21 and I’m already the cat lady.
how about dbags & tools? emotionally retarded men? yeah…
Here’s hoping you someday meet one of the group of men you’ve never met but are nonetheless attracted to you. You still have hope! Stop getting cats before it’s too late!
unfortunately she isn’t attracted to any of them, according to the diagram. That’s the biggest problem I have with the graph. Then again, the point is that she’s going to be a cat lady, so I guess it kind of works.
Why men aren’t attracted to you? You’re a cat lady.
but just think of all the pussy you could get
Wow. That sums up my LIFE. I just need the “creeps and losers” part magnified by a lot.
Wait, so most of the men who are attracted to you are men you’ve never met?
Men whom she’s never met could be attracted to her, and therein lies part of the problem – they’re such pathetic losers that they’re too intimidated to make contact.
stalkers?
wait a min – so men who are attracted to you either have never met you, or they have met you and they are creeps and losers.
Wow. Over-analysis of a joke. You people have a lot of time on your hands! (I think it’s funny.)
Fear not!
You could always become a lesbian.
Reason #17 why I think that must be biological and not a choice… If I could have done that, believe me I would have by now.
You could date a transsexual. The benefits of a boyfriend with the benefits of a girlfriend with none of the problems of either
…or, and it’s a scary thought, the problems of BOTH!!!!! >:)
There are two parts missing from this graph, and they are men met on internet and men that live over a hundred miles away. And then it would be a perfect representation of my love life.
Hehe, funny graph! You shouldn’t be so hard on yourself tho. I would think that “Men who are attracted to me” should be roughly the same size as “Men to whom I am attracted.”
Someone’s a little picky.
yeah, give the creeps, losers, gay men and men in committed relationships a chance!
1 circle cannot mean 2 different things. The Creeps and Losers and Men Attracted To Me catagories need to be 2 different circles. That’s the point of a circle graph. One can consume the other, but must be separate.
“Creeps and losers” refers to the intersection, which implies they are creeps BECAUSE they met her.
That’s one messed up catgirl.
OR, you could have “men who are attracted to me” contained in “creeps and losers”, which would make the graph maker seem a lot less insane.
Good call
This graph makes no sense.
Ya gotta be a girl with really crappy ‘man luck’ or ‘girl luck.’
You gotta have been told mean things like ‘there’s not enough beers in the world to make me have dinner with you’, only to have it recanted when the person realizes you were asking if he was attending the company picnic, not going on a date. And of course, you aren’t supposed to be pissed and be all chummy with that person later, ‘if you want to keep your job.’
Get to that place, hon, and this chart makes all the sense in the world.
This pisses me off… It’s because you’re so damn picky and label any man you’ve met that doesn’t happen to meet your most likely frightfully high standards ‘creepy and losers.’ I bet you’re a real Virgin Mary yourself, aren’t you? The only way you’d ever become a ‘cat lady,’ and anybody else who posts on here that sympathizes with you, is from your own self-made situation. Stop complaining and do something about it!
I’m going to make a guess here and posit that you get turned down a lot.
by settling for the creeps and losers? personally, i´d rather be a virgin forever than have that.
I’m inclined to agree. It is a distinct possibility, and not one I view as a problem.
theres a lot of cranky men on this site!!!
Yeah, the women’s attitudes are kinda “c’est la vie”, but the men seem to get nasty and insulting.
Well, perhaps I’m assuming the nasty and insulting ones are men . . . hmm. Wouldn’t they be the ones who might take it personally? Yeah, I think so.
They fall into the creeps and lodrt circle that’s outside the men met circle. Hee hee.
Well, since you want to take the joke out of the joke, let’s discuss this.
If you want to take it literally as a Venn diagram, everything outside is the (U)niverse, thus, every man that has never been seen nor met falls into that area. The circles include all the possibilities of (U) excluding men that have not been seen nor met. On the more complicated Venn diagrams I’ve worked with, and tortured my students with. In these diagrams X can intersect with A, yet Y is neither inclusive to X nor inclusive to A, yet intersects both X and A. This creates a rather interesting anomaly in some of the more radical areas of physics. Or perhaps your more of a strictly ‘if you can see it, it must be’ physicist.
What typos? Criticize more precisely.
Must be late. What I meant to say was since there’s so many people trying to ridicule the creator about the actual diagram, we should discuss that. That’s what I get for typing after bedtime!
You’re attracted to gay men you’ve never met? AND you’re attracted to men in comitted relationships you’ve never met? You have some issues.
Actually that bit I have no problem with – why can’t a woman be attracted to gay and/or married men they haven’t met. I am attracted to gay and/or married women I’ve never met. They’re called celebrities.
OMG! Really? You don’t know how someone could be attracted to someone they’ve never actually met face to face? Think magazines models, or Laucha Libre wrestlers, or hot Bollywood actors/actresses. You see them, they look hot, but you have not met them. Sadly, the attraction is one way. *sigh* Therefore, they must go outside the men met circle. Simple and sadly.
I think this chart is hilarious. People who are insulting the creator and calling her “fat” “ugly” and “picky” have probably been rejected so many times that even the thought of another rejection makes them defensive. It’s a joke.
all the good men are either taken or gay…. the rest are a bunch of bums.
this can pretty much go both ways.
some guy could make a graph “Why I’ll be a bitter old man.”
man i can’t wait to be old and angry for no adequate reason.
I agree with this graph!
Sorry, this is way too confusing. Venn diagram size fail, typo fail, confusing interesections; You know, work on yourself first, hon. If you get happy with you then you don’t need kind of graph.
Let me guess. You’re a man. In a relationship. Get lucky often. Thinks a self make-over actually attracts people. Truly believes beauty is within, but would never, ever be caught dead in public with someone large than him, or not as attractive. Doesn’t like the scarecrow look of runway models, but thinks the bods in Playboy or Playgirl are hot however unrealistic.
And you can’t see the ironic joke in this diagram?
No gay men are in committed relationships!?
Wow, my life is about to take a major turn downhill.
So gay men can’t be in committed relationships? What the hell. This graph is blatantly discriminatory and I, for one, am offended. You, ma’am, are the reason that hate perpetuates itself in our society. You should be ashamed. Ashamed.
I hope that’s a rhetorical joke…
Way to read way too much into this joke. But I suppose when you look for reasons to be offended, you can indeed be offended by just about anything.
Hmm… If I were to alter this, I think the men attracted to me would be smaller, about the size of a pinhead. And the men I’m attracted to would be larger, and men I’ve actually met would be ginormous! Like off the page.
I’m right there with you. I too will grow into the cat lady and the police will find me dead, with a gazzillion still well fed cats. … Becuase I’d have a gazzillion well fed hamsters at the time of my death too.
There needs to be a separate subsection for ex-boyfriends. Ones you’d take back, and ones that would take you back. They should be completely enclosed within the Men I’ve Met category. And there should be no overlap.
This person sure has met a LOT of men who are not in a serious relationship. In fact, most of the men she has met is not creepy, or gay. But also apparently not attractive. Conclusion:
She will become a cat woman because she is lesbian.
Speaking as another single woman in the late 20’s, I sympathize with the grapher (and feel some of you take your internet humor graph correctness a little too seriously). I’ve both met and dated guys who were attracted to me and not creeps, losers, etc., despite the fact that I am a fat woman who already has cats. I won’t say an UGLY fat woman, because previous remarks state that as a non-redundancy, I have nice skin and features, and some guys are fetished that way.
I still believe I will find the right one, it’s just a matter of time. It probably helps that I don’t mind if my guy is hefty. In fact, I like that.
sadly, this is so very very true…
This is an off shoot of i can has cheeze burger so it is really about having lots of cuddly cats to love later in life. Don’t be so critical people it is cute and fun not life changing.
Lady, noone finds you attractive. Remove the green circle.
Fatty.
Whoa! Hey now, that was completely uncalled for.
There’s one thing that annoys me about this web site: these graphs were made for fun, and everyone seems to forget that!
Seriously, this was obviously meant as a cute, playful joke. Kindly remember this the next time your asshole instincts are tingling. >:(
What if just my asshole is tingling?
notice hows there is a little sliver mixing the “gay men and man i am attracted too” >.>
still funny graph thou
So true.