Comments on: Chances of Quick Load of Youtube Videos

By: this is my username

this is my username — Sat, 19 Dec 2009 18:18:25 +0000

SO TRUE

By: sjerrie

sjerrie — Wed, 09 Dec 2009 20:22:49 +0000

we were talkin abou utube here ;P

but with other vid sites, true i guess XD

By: Sarah

Sarah — Sat, 20 Jun 2009 21:03:47 +0000

Actually, I was thinking maybe it was that each is individual, so the chances of it loading when this happens. then the chances of it loading when something else happens.

By: vaporware

vaporware — Tue, 16 Jun 2009 12:01:49 +0000

it’s because you press the refresh button, if you wouldn’t have hit it, it would’ve stayed the same… it’s not like it would’ve worked if you had just waited that second.., so don’t feel sad.

By: Brad

Brad — Mon, 08 Jun 2009 05:06:53 +0000

Yes, that was the problem I have with this graph! The author has a poor concept of probability considering that none of these can occur simultaneously. Thus, it must add up to < or = 100%!

By: Brad

Brad — Mon, 08 Jun 2009 05:04:35 +0000

It’s terrible when the comments are funnier than the graphs! I had to re-read the original to see it was from “Fred.”

By: Durr

Durr — Sun, 07 Jun 2009 17:57:34 +0000

sum(all probability in this graph) must be < or = 100%. not the case. wahhhh.

By: Sarah

Sarah — Sun, 07 Jun 2009 15:54:54 +0000

ZOMG I ROFLED

By: Ghostwish

Ghostwish — Sat, 06 Jun 2009 11:44:39 +0000

It’s called a cache, morons. Increase your browser’s memory allocation.

Fail graph is fail.

By: Bubes McCoy

Bubes McCoy — Sat, 06 Jun 2009 11:33:12 +0000

Damn straight, and embedded videos are even more painful.

By: Stix

Stix — Sat, 06 Jun 2009 05:23:52 +0000

I feel your pain.

By: Sewer Rat

Sewer Rat — Sat, 06 Jun 2009 04:08:25 +0000

Once I was talking about Freud with a friend, and a guy who overheard us said, “Didn’t he get mauled by a tiger?” Apparently, he mistook Sigmund Freud for Seigfreid (sp?) and Roy. FAIL.

By: Vortico

Vortico — Sat, 06 Jun 2009 01:17:07 +0000

This is actually one of the most true graphs in a while.
After 2 minutes of waiting on the video to buffer, I press refresh, just as the video starts loading.
LOL!

By: Vortico

Vortico — Sat, 06 Jun 2009 01:15:05 +0000

You know you added “u” in “Fred,” which wasn’t in the original comment. What’s Todd trying to tell you?

By: blazinghyphens

blazinghyphens — Fri, 05 Jun 2009 22:43:56 +0000

You know you just added “gay”, which wasn’t in the original comment.
What’s Freud trying to tell you?

By: Todd

Todd — Fri, 05 Jun 2009 19:40:34 +0000

Your buddy sends you gay porn? You have a boss?

Sounds like someone drinks from the river of suck.

By: Fred

Fred — Fri, 05 Jun 2009 19:05:35 +0000

You forgot:

“When your buddy sent you porn at work and your boss happens to be walking into your office”: 100%

By: Sarah

Sarah — Fri, 05 Jun 2009 16:38:59 +0000

Sitcoms are pretty much fail nowadays anyway.

The only graph that comes to mind where I actually laughed out loud was the first time I saw that Rick Astley graph…

By: A Random Pooka

A Random Pooka — Fri, 05 Jun 2009 16:35:41 +0000

None of them are pee your pants funny. It’s just that when you first started reading them, it was such a new idea. Now you read them out of habit. Soon, you’re going to see them on sitcoms. The guys on Big Bang Theory being the first ones to likely mention it.

All our base are belong to them anyway.

Sitcoms are where memes go to die.

By: Sarah

Sarah — Fri, 05 Jun 2009 16:25:53 +0000

Actually now that I’m seeing the old ones again, those really aren’t that funny either. I guess it was the middle that was best. 0_o

By: Sarah

Sarah — Fri, 05 Jun 2009 16:17:19 +0000

I’m not the person you were speaking to….but I do faintly remember graphs being funny…..sometimes looking at the first couple pages of graph jam is fun.

By: feckineejit

feckineejit — Fri, 05 Jun 2009 16:13:42 +0000

Hey Homer, remember when graphs were funny?

By: Homer

Homer — Fri, 05 Jun 2009 16:13:08 +0000

32 nd