Make your own using our Graph Builder or upload your own files, images or videos. All our charts are user-submitted.
« Previous The Customer Is Always… | When I Need to Buy Something Next »
Make your own using our Graph Builder or upload your own files, images or videos. All our charts are user-submitted.
« Previous The Customer Is Always… | When I Need to Buy Something Next »
Spelling fail.
Pointing out the obvious win.
Spellcheck FTW! I love Mudkipz!
Venn Diagram fail.
I agree…
on top of that Mythbusters deal with physics also and McGuyver deals with Mathematics … this is all around a fail!
its McGyver. No u.
Unless he’s wearing bio-booster armor from Chronos.
No, YOU!
It’s MacGyver. No u. With an a. Also with an apostrophe between t and s.
They must be thinking of “MacGruber” instead of MacGyver.
Came for the MacGruber reference… Thanks so mucBOOOM!
Also Numb3rs does a bunch of stuff that really falls under Computer Science… and that’s not even on the diagram
I always regretted not studying more Enginnering in college . . .
Yeah. I hear you can make good money as an enginner.
I always knew engineers couldn’t spell.
They obviously need more “dicipline”, whatever that is.
As an engineer I have to say that this statement is true.
However, the graph is not.
I hear moose bites can be pretty painful.
pretty funny aside from the spelling
SPELING NAUGHT REQIRED?
why is myth busters not included in physics?
I am wondering that myself. What about the swing experiment? The “how much force” classics? The “hitting the ground running”?
The explosions?
i <3 mythbusters they make things go BOOM!
In my opinion, Numb3rs = House + CSI. Perfect description, no?
House = House + CSI
Thats like.. Win = Win + Fail!? in theory this is a good chart, but the execution is fail.
I think that means CSI = 0
yes, yes it does
This graph can be compared to a pile of turd so big it blots out the sun.
If I could give it a minus twenty, I’d do it.
MacGyver. Why can’t people spell these days?
Because they lack dicipline.
Ha! True! Apathy figures in, as well, I think. The old WHINE I remember from school days: “WHY do I have to learn this?”
I see what you did they’re.
They’re?
Um, I thought you misspelled discipline intentionally. So I… never mind.
Ignore KJ, it was a great comeback! Who has dicipline anyway? Sounds a bit BDSM to me…
I *did* misspell it intentionally. But so few seem to get their/they’re/there accurate, your intention wasn’t as obvious to me.
I’ll try to be more oblivious next time.
excellent
This would be funnier if “engineering” and “MacGyver” were spelled correctly.
Are you saying that “diciplines” is actually funnier being spelled wrong, or did you just not notice that one?
Anyway, as an Arts student, I think it’s hilarious that this graph has so many spelling errors… far funnier than the intended point of the graph.
It’s both funny and pathetic. Engineers get it into their minds that they don’t need to know anything but engineering. It’s only when they get into the real world that they realize that without social and communication skills, they’ll never advance past that entry-level position. Nobody cares how brilliant you are if you scare off the clients with hostility and arrogance, or if you can’t write a coherent memo to explain what you’re doing.
As a structural engineer, I have to say, I was totally turned off by the enginner and dicipline spelling errors – mainly the engineering one. Unfortunately I must not be a typical engineer, since I did not notice the Mcgyver error and, on a side note, have never even seen the show. I totally agree that most engineers lack strong writing, spelling, and social skills, which make us all look bad!
Excellent diagram – only because its many errors spawned the best comments I’ve seen on this or any of the related sites. I lol’d more than ever before.
…and since we’re picking it apart let me mention that it should be “among” rather than “between” since it mentions more than two disciplines.
Spelling fail always turns me off.
But “The Big Bang Theory” turns me on again. I love my nerd boys.
Wolowitz owns
Sheldon’s my favorite
Mythbusters is basically the only thing we talk about in physics class, so I don’t know what kind of physics people you’re talking about there.
I agree.
I just finished physics last semester. Of course, Mythbusters almost always deals with kinetics, not modern physics (like photoelectricity and mass defect – which belongs in Chemistry anyway.)
Erm–Doesn’t calling them Math-based “Diciplines” kind of negate the whole thing anyway? In that sense, wouldn’t they all be Mathematics?
I mean, on top of all the other things that are horribly wrong with this graph.
Short answer, no.
Physics borrows from math, engineering borrows from physics; engineers barely remember how to do math.
lol. But the point is that they’re “Math-based” and that means that the person making the graph is admitting that they all have something to do with Mathematics anyway.
Well I’m an engineer and I make spelling a top priority! As do many of my peers.
That said, this graph obviously wasn’t created by an engineer because Mythbusters should go in the middle, the Big Bang Theory should go between physics and math (engineers don’t care about the Big Bang), and Bill Nye the Science Guy should go on there somewhere.
I think this is some art major’s perception of the sciences, not somebody from within.
…
AHAHAHA, REALLY.
As an engineer who loves TBBT and has engineering coworker friends who love it, I strongly disagree. My enjoyment of seeing it in the middle made me totally miss the glaring faults of the diagram.
The middle should of been Walker Texas Ranger because Chuck Norris defies all of those things.
ROFL enginnering
What mathematics does Myth Busters ever use outside of the mathematics used in physics?
You never saw that myth that 2+2 actually equals five? Kidding aside, the graph is all wrong.
There’s a lot of chemistry based mathematics involved in the show. Kind of important to know how much potentially volatile substance to use.
Maths-based .. not Math-Based .. idiots.
wohohoho, crazy! I never realized that it’s maths, not math before! Maths-based does not roll off the tongue easily. (No sarcasm, I’m serious!)
-thx
Almost as fun as Mathsturbation
I’ve never heard it referred to as Maths within the US, and I never heard of it referred to as such before I was twenty. I’m pretty sure Math-based stands as proper usage for the United States.
Oh, you silly prescriptionist. Welcome to the world, also known as what actually happens! Also, what happens everywhere west of you.
Britain isn’t everything.
the term ‘math’ is used in the usa, and the term ‘maths’ is used in england, new zealand, australia and many other countries. both can be considered correct.
I don’t think anyone watches The Big Bang Theory. MythBusters, on the other hand, is well beloved by all.
Actually, The Big Bang Theory is becoming more and more popular
You idiots rant on about semantics and masturbation… AWESOME GRAPH!!!!
Ugh, I watched an episode of big bang theory and it was painfully dumb. it was more or less “lets pack all the nerdy steriotypes into as few characters as we can”.
thats coming from someone who graduated in comp-sci and used to be in engineering… so i love nerdy stuff.
how did this show get so popular? none of the characters have any personality, just gimmicks.
I’m so glad I’m majoring in mechannicle enginnering and not english, or I might get upset about this graph.
Take the big bang theory out of the equation and put mythbusters in the middle, and that might actually be sorta funny.
EPIC + WIN = The Big Bang Theory
spelling fail
I LOVE the geeks – especially Sheldon!
Well since Physics is applied Mathematics and Engineering is applied Physics, I pronounce this a fail. And besides Myth Busters is the only show that actually USES any of them.
numb3rs uses math aksually
there is a site with the actual calculations being used for each episode
I love that show!