Percentage of internet topics made about the Watchmen movie
Percentage of internet topics made about the Watchmen movie
Graph by terminaadventurer, via our GraphJam builder.
You May Like:
Make your own using our Graph Builder or upload your own files, images or videos. All our charts are user-submitted.
« Previous The Marx Brothers | Subjects Of Slayer Songs Next »
So it has 180% of comments?
Thats just what I was asking
1. This movie sucked because the blue guy’s penis was in every scene.
2. What if kids were watching this when the blue guy’s penis appeared on screen?
3. The blue guy’s penis was everywhere, which improved the quality of this movie.
4. My kid watched this movie and it had a bunch of bad scenes including a blue guy’s penis.
5. Did you see that blue guy’s penis?
40% of the above comments are about the quality of the movie
40% of the above comments are about kids watching the movie and it having “bad scenes.”
100% of the above comments are about the blue guy’s penis.
Pwned.
Why would somebody take their kid to an R rated movie?
Many bad parents do this, presumably because they feel that leaving their precious snowflake at home with a baby sitter will damage his mental health.
I was taken to many R rated movies as a child and I came out just fine. But then again, my parents knew that it was R-rated for a reason. They explained, like reasonable parents should 1) where babies came from, 2) that violence is bad, and fake violence should not be imitated, 3) that if I threw a temper tantrum or cried in the movie, I would be spanked like wild demon spawn should be.
There’s a difference between bad parents and parents who take their kids to R rated movies. Sometimes the groups overlap, but don’t mistake them as being synonymous.
Well, that’s a good point. (My parents helped me sneak into an R rated
movie
But when people say kids, I assume like five year olds, which is a little
to young to know about sex, but when the dark knight came out, a
whole bunch of parents were complaining about how dark it was and it scared their kids. It was fucking pg thirteen. It wasn’t like watership down
which had communist rabits and violence but was only pg.
Agreed. My siblings and I watch many R-rated super hero movies because my Mom and Dad loved them and it was more expensive to hire a sitter for 4 kids than to just take them to the movies. All things were explained clearly before we set foot one in the theater. My parents were great.
Luckeeeeee!!
WIN
You’re absolutely right. Genius. By the way the penis did improve the quality of the movie.
no, not ‘pwned.’
According to this guy, 40% + 40% + 100% = 100% >.>
Probably some overlap, mainly in columns 2 and 3.
OP is 100% correct, and that made me sad. That pissed me off so badly…A: it’s rated R for a reason. Despite the fact that the MPAA can suck it, it was rated R -because- of the violence. DON’T TAKE YOUR FUCKING KIDS TO THIS MOVIE. B: Grow the fuck up. It’s male genitalia. If you’re that titillated by it, call the fucking cock police.
…
Also, I fucking love Watchmen. <3 (The GN still has a place in my heart, but I think I like the movie more.)
TL;DR: Rant comment; move along.
actually, it fails to mention the arguments about how it was somehow Lucy Lawless that played Laurie Jupiter
Banana Hammock!
You fail.
I think a venn diagram would’ve been more appropriate in the case of the overlap, but this still definitely gets its message across, and I find the obsession with the blue guy’s penis annoying. Great, he’s got a penis and it’s hanging out.
Here’s why he’s naked: he feels disconnected from humanity. He’s apart from them now. Why wear clothes? It’s pointless to him. He isn’t naked just to be naked. The parents complaining about their kids seeing it probably thought the movie was going to be something like the link (it’s hilarious but I’m sure everyone has seen it).
Great movie. Simply amazing!
Here, here! Too many haters in the world.
Mmmm. Dr. Manhattan totally made that movie for me. I mean. Mrower.
Congrats on being the first to refer to “The Blue Guy” by his actual name. Dr. Manhattan or you could get fancy and call him Jon Osterman.
You forgot how fucking TERRIBLE that movie was. What a disappointment! *sigh*
A bit of a graph design fail, but I get the penis I mean point.
Ok, R doesn’t mean REALLY GREAT. It means Restricted. If you’re dumb enough to take your kid to see this movie you need a smack upside your head. There is no valid reason to take your kid to a movie like this. The violence alone is bad, but the sex just adds to the rating. Don’t be an idiot. The only people seeing this movie should be 18+
Deal with it.
Excuse me.
R-Rated movies are 17+.
And I don’t think kids should be seeing this movie, but at least teens can.
good movie but it had alotta blue dick in it
I think that if you’re mature enough to read the book and actually understand it, you’re mature enough to see the movie. I’m fifteen, and saw it the day it came out. Watchmen has been one of my favorite books for some time. Obviously there are some disturbing things in the movie, and it really annoys me that there were about a dozen five year olds running around the theater.
The real question here is
DID HE HAVE A SEVERE CASE OF BLUEBALLS?! And why wasn’t it cured after he humped that chick?
Ha! and ew…but mostly HA!
actually, it wasn’t blueballs. Don’t you watch The Daily Show? Billy Crudup has a circulation problem ;P
Thanks for the comments everybody! I know the percentage thing is messed up, but I really didn’t know how I could measure the Watchmen topics. I just used percentages on a whim. I’m glad everybody still got the point.
You FAIL. Hardcore. Why not make the percentages up so that they make sense if you’re going to make them up?
blah, stop whining. hardcore is just a bit mean, man.
FAIL
40 + 40 + 100 = 100?
wut?
Ugh, the blue penis was in about 3 scenes. Stop fucking complaining about it.
Dammit people, get OVER seeing Dr. Manhattan’s penis, already! If there was a chick running around with her boobs out the whole damn time, no one would have cared. I had to sit behind some idiot who snickered and giggled and bitched EVERY TIME he saw the guy’s d*ck. I wanted to kick his head and tell him to grow the f*ck up. This is why I hate going to see movies in the theater anymore.
People. It’s rated R for a reason.
Also, a lot of people discussed the fact that the ending was changed. This doesn’t fit into any of the graph’s categories, since it’s a separate issue from the movie’s quality. The Hitler remix didn’t even mention Dr. Manhattan’s penis.
It was quite sad. I went to see it on Saturday night after it came out and was sickened by the number of people who GIGGLED every single time Dr. Manhattan’s penis was on screen. I was quite appalled at the complete immaturity at the entire thing by grown adults, especially since I was much younger than they were (they were in their thirties, probably, and I’ll be 20 on Saturday).
Yay for censorship and its effects.
i wanted to see superheros fighting and actually be able to get into the storyline and plot, not look at closeups of blue penis 60% of the movie, practically ruined it for me, didn’t notice any immature people around me, but that would have made it all the more suck. i mean i get hes disconnected from humanity and their ways ect, but they focused on it a lil to much…
Fail
It was rater R in the states?!
Wow! It was like MA (mature audience) in Australia.
And yes, why did they make a penis the main bit of the movie?
there wasnt THAT much Dr. Manhatten penis. and he was nude because he is detached.
it should be percentage of time saying how badass Rorschach is(that would be 100% btw)
rorschach scares me. kind of. but hes kinda awesome too. and jeez, my dad took me to see it, and he’s a great parent. although he did mention that he thought the R rating was for violence, not… well… you know.
I’m confused about the comments about the penis being so prominent (“good movie but it had alotta blue dick in it”, “closeups of blue penis 60% of the movie”). Yeah, I saw it, he was nude, but most of the time I was paying attention to the MOVIE, not the naked guy’s penis, so unless YOU were focusing on the penis for 60% of the movie, I don’t remember it being that big of a deal. Besides, I don’t think there was ever a closeup of it, the cinematography was good like that, Dr. Manhattan’s genetalia was never emphasised, it was just there, like his hand, or his feet. Any emphasis was in the head of the person complaining about it, because they were distracted by it.
my sister went and saw it twice, the second time she counted 23 times.
Seriously though, Dr. Manhattan was glowing so much you could hardly see his penis…and if that is the first thing you noticed about him, you had to be looking for it.
I’d rather complain about cut-off limbs or split heads than nonsexual nudity, but that may be just me.
he f*cked a chick. just because he was also in the other room, means its nonsexual :O?
That was ONE scene. But *sigh* for the nitpickers: MOSTLY nonsexual nudity >_>” Of course there was sexual nudity as well ( and lots of it) but I was talking about Dr.Manhattan here.
yeah thats kinda what i was thinking
Listen, I think the movie was one of the worst ones I have seen in a while that was based on a comic book, simply because I assume you had to read the comic or know the basis of the comic to understand everything. I haven’t read it, so I was disconnected to begin with…. As far as the cock everywhere, I think it could have been shown way less, and just because every guy has one doesn’t mean I want to see it 23 times. Just remember too, that 23 times is about 23 more times than you see cock in all the other movies….
“Just remember too, that 23 times is about 23 more times than you see cock in all the other movies….”
Yep, that’s how I judge my movies. If theres something in a movie that can’t be found in a majority of all the other Hollywood b.s., then it is obviously a bad thing.
You forgot the “How the Hell does Rorschach’s mask works?” for all the internet retards that didn’t read the book.
The peen wasn’t any more prominent than it was in the book, and the point of it, as several people have said, is that Dr. Manhattan is not human, he’s kind of a supernatural being. You think any super natural being gives a shit if their junk is showing? Probs not. I remember no close ups on it, and it was never even shown erect – that would have been vulgar, gratuitous, and an inaccurate representation of the original.
My biggest problem with the movie was the soundtrack – I get that they were trying to emphasize the time setting of the story, but the songs were too obvious, entered too abruptly, and I was especially bothered by the use of Simon & Garfunkel. Only The Graduate gets S&G. I’d really like to see the film redone with an original orchestral score. I feel like they were trying to pick old songs that even most young people would know, but I think their choices were generally distasteful – and I’m only 20. My mother would be livid if she heard a Hendrix song in a movie like that.
… You do know that some of the songs came directly from the book right? Even All Along the Watchtower.
Was wondering what the experts of this website think about online money making sites.
Especially where you place ads on G and Y and other search engines.
Are they legit? Scam Artists? I e-mailed them regarding a proofs and they said they were legit and
had received praise from customers. Is this legit?
Also I found one site that claims you can [url=http://www.viddler.com/explore/MrBaker39]make money[/url]
and especially [url=http://www.viddler.com/explore/MrBaker39]make money online[/url].
Now, what do you think about it?
Please post your comments!
I’m a woman, and all I could think was, I would not pass up the opportunity for a threesome with 2 guys. The best part it’s not even cheating. I also like to read BL so I would probably make him make out with himself while I watch. I <3 boys with other boys! LOL
As for parents taking kids to this movie. It’s rated R. Derrrrrrrrr. Boys have them, girls will learn of them. Big deal. Fight repression, society will be healthier.
I’m 11, and me and my mom might go see Zombieland