Comments on: What’s In The Living room of a house with a toddler

By: Blargh

Blargh — Mon, 30 Nov 2009 15:11:31 +0000

Poor you.

By: Quackoid

Quackoid — Mon, 16 Nov 2009 21:47:41 +0000

There is nothing happy about this, KaBooM! (Although it IS funneh)
How would YOU like THAT to be YOUR living room?

Nvm that. Anyways, 5/4.
(4 cuz its not a graph.)

By: mommy callahan

mommy callahan — Tue, 22 Sep 2009 20:50:33 +0000

umm they forgot the fingure printed TV and the broken handel off the entertainment center

By: Clambert

Clambert — Tue, 04 Aug 2009 21:20:48 +0000

And the frazzled mother, of course

By: Elfking

Elfking — Tue, 12 May 2009 22:56:32 +0000

I know what the substance is. I call it Chemical DEWK, which stands for Don’t Even Want to Know.

By: Rayzor

Rayzor — Wed, 04 Mar 2009 19:06:09 +0000

This one is one of the best I’ve seen. (I would argue that it is a graph. It’s obvious that there are two toys that are not completely covered by the stocky stuff. Okay, it may not be a true “graph” but it gets an A+ for creativity.) The only thing funnier is some of the comments people have left. (Hamster reference = ROTFL!) What we need is a new graph: Number of people who saw this graph that aren’t perverts = 5% (those would be the parents that have had toddlers and pets who didn’t get the wrong idea about “sticky substance”) and Number of people who saw this graph that ARE perverts = 95%

By: Mikey

Mikey — Sun, 01 Mar 2009 06:06:48 +0000

THey also coulda titled this what’s in the dorm of a male college student

By: chickens

chickens — Thu, 26 Feb 2009 02:23:51 +0000

??????wtf???????that is disturbing yet probably unintentional…..u kno….. on and 4 the person who said distressed cat……..WHO THE HECK F**KS CATS!!!!!

By: caghs

caghs — Sat, 07 Feb 2009 20:25:59 +0000

Yet another opinion stated as fact *sigh*

Try “I think this graph is stupid” …

By: caghs

caghs — Sat, 07 Feb 2009 20:23:21 +0000

To a child, EVERYTHING is a toy

By: caghs

caghs — Sat, 07 Feb 2009 20:22:24 +0000

Ever thought that if these ‘incorrect uses’ upset you so much, you’re on the wrong site?

Why not start your own site, where you can censor those that don’t meet your standards?

Or better yet, get a life and/or a sense of humour!

By: caghs

caghs — Sat, 07 Feb 2009 20:19:29 +0000

When a toddler is involved? Who WANTS to know?

By: caghs

caghs — Sat, 07 Feb 2009 20:18:05 +0000

Contemporary observations in graph form, I believe is the idea … not ‘correct’ graphs that satisfy the anally retentive among us.

In which case, this is a win for anyone who has ever spent five minutes in a house inhabited by at least one toddler

And for those who are so obsessed with how ‘correct’ it is? I’d like to see a graph describing the contents of your butt, something like:

Fecal Matter: 10%
Gas: 2%
Skin: 14%
Various rods and possibly hamsters: 74%

By: operator

operator — Sat, 07 Feb 2009 00:35:27 +0000

yeah, that pretty much covers it. (i has a toddler)

By: lawl

lawl — Fri, 06 Feb 2009 11:37:25 +0000

LOL, I’ve never heard that one. Friends once told me “Cleaning up after a child is like shoveling the snow before the blizzard ends”.

So true.

By: cstaley

cstaley — Wed, 04 Feb 2009 13:13:33 +0000

Not anymore, no. But I guess today’s toddlers are more (less?) sophisticated than yesterday’s.

By: lulu

lulu — Wed, 04 Feb 2009 07:05:46 +0000

you obviously don’t have, or watch toddlers…

By: Alexis

Alexis — Tue, 03 Feb 2009 18:13:38 +0000

You need to meet my toddler. The sofa is the greatest toy of all.

By: Fred Pennsylvania

Fred Pennsylvania — Tue, 03 Feb 2009 15:30:47 +0000

Monidon isn’t really a moron. He just doesn’t have any children yet.

The graph is brilliant! Good job thinking “outside the box,” too!

By: cstaley

cstaley — Tue, 03 Feb 2009 13:18:03 +0000

If you have furniture that is also considered a toy, then you could do that, yes.

By: jackie31337

jackie31337 — Tue, 03 Feb 2009 11:49:39 +0000

I think “unidentifiable sticky substance” covers those too (pun not originally intended).

By: lulu

lulu — Tue, 03 Feb 2009 05:23:26 +0000

nope…toys bubble needs to touch furniture bubble…but so close….

By: caleal

caleal — Tue, 03 Feb 2009 04:54:00 +0000

I should have just asked someone.

By: cstaley

cstaley — Tue, 03 Feb 2009 01:46:37 +0000

Agreed. However, I made no attempt to be either of those things.

By: Monidon

Monidon — Tue, 03 Feb 2009 00:06:06 +0000

This graph is stupid.

By: Fritters

Fritters — Mon, 02 Feb 2009 21:40:04 +0000

Too accurate to be funny 0_o

By: aiuiof

aiuiof — Mon, 02 Feb 2009 20:48:43 +0000

The point you’re missing is that your attempt is nether clever nor humorous

By: Motas

Motas — Mon, 02 Feb 2009 20:39:49 +0000

More like, which part of the couch is being used as a toy.

By: Stephen

Stephen — Mon, 02 Feb 2009 19:29:16 +0000

With some proper colorization we could distinguish between the toys under the chair and sofa and those stuck under the cushions.

By: cstaley

cstaley — Mon, 02 Feb 2009 18:43:01 +0000

The folks that are complaining about the blatant misunderstanding of a Venn diagram aren’t being uptight, anal-retentive, or otherwise unreasonable. Nor are they kid haters. As has already been mentioned, this is a site about humor as conveyed through the narrow prism of graphs. The whole point is to be clever. How accurate the subject matter is has no relevance if you aren’t clever.

This is what the diagram should have looked like:
http://mine.icanhascheezburger.com/view.aspx?ciid=3304377

By: WhoCares

WhoCares — Mon, 02 Feb 2009 17:21:19 +0000

So true

By: papajon

papajon — Mon, 02 Feb 2009 16:53:50 +0000

Ah! A graph that is topical, timeless, mimicing an actual chid-infested living room, nice beat, easy to dance too… I give it a 17! Well done!

By: cj

cj — Mon, 02 Feb 2009 16:43:57 +0000

You obviously have never lived with a toddler. Everything is always covered in some unidentifiable sticky subtance. ie: jelly syrup or don’t even want to know….

By: toddler's mom

toddler's mom — Mon, 02 Feb 2009 16:42:49 +0000

Yeah, that would be about right…most toys are now fully unrecognizable due to the amout of *uss* residing on them. The last time I tried washing them was epic fail, so I gave up. When said toddler turns 5, I may consider purchasing new toys.

By: David

David — Mon, 02 Feb 2009 16:05:32 +0000

A wise man once told me, cleaning up after your children is like wiping before you are doing taking care of business…a bit disturbing but true.

By: dr42ix

dr42ix — Mon, 02 Feb 2009 15:23:30 +0000

this graph is disgusting and inaccurate. how can a couch also be part of a toy!?

By: Troy

Troy — Mon, 02 Feb 2009 14:25:38 +0000

What “toys”, exactly?

By: Troy

Troy — Mon, 02 Feb 2009 14:25:10 +0000

It would appear that some parts of the couch are not only an unidentifiable sticky substance, but they are also a toy.

In fact, every toy is an unidentifiable sticky substance. 8\

By: Rox

Rox — Mon, 02 Feb 2009 14:09:54 +0000

I agree! (Cue the “I’m so happy I had them anyway” responses!)

By: Elliot

Elliot — Mon, 02 Feb 2009 12:06:47 +0000

Mmmm. The whole point is that this is GraphJam. Funny things through the medium of graphs. Funny things through a corrupt mess that is a bastardisation of graphs it is not. The fun comes from the graph form anyway, the joke here is pretty poor in any standards.

By: Elliot

Elliot — Mon, 02 Feb 2009 12:04:40 +0000

It more than slightly defies the point of this being Graphjam though. Messing with graphs defeats the point more than slightly.

By: Czernobog

Czernobog — Mon, 02 Feb 2009 11:16:25 +0000

You got the gist of it.

ICHC is full of saccharine interplay, Pundit Kitchen is full of trolls, ROFLRazzi is full of of really good looking people who look down at Angelina Jolie, and GraphJam is full of anal-retentives.

By: Dawn

Dawn — Mon, 02 Feb 2009 10:50:55 +0000

ohhh man that was a gooood laugh (SICK) but funny

By: Paz

Paz — Mon, 02 Feb 2009 08:33:17 +0000

who knows…

By: Paz

Paz — Mon, 02 Feb 2009 08:31:47 +0000

A toddler came on all of his toys? Now that just CAN’T be right.

By: Erinn

Erinn — Mon, 02 Feb 2009 03:58:30 +0000

The point isn’t whether the sentiment makes sense or not…It’s still not a graph, which, if I’m correct, is the object of GraphJam.

By: caleal

caleal — Mon, 02 Feb 2009 03:30:17 +0000

I guess I picked the wrong post to start reading comments on… never again. Never again.

By: gabi

gabi — Mon, 02 Feb 2009 02:18:01 +0000

ok so. it’s not a venn diagram. it’s hillarious. and it’s some other sort of diagram. it’s still a WIN.

By: Lainie

Lainie — Sun, 01 Feb 2009 22:31:47 +0000

LOL…my mind was going the same route there.

By: Shancey

Shancey — Sun, 01 Feb 2009 21:50:25 +0000

No, seriously, imagination or not, use the graph correctly. Yes, we’re being serious, because the focus is on the graph and not the content. Otherwise it’d be “pointing-out-stupid-thingsjam.com”