What’s In The Living room of a house with a toddler

What’s In The Living room of a house with a toddler
picture: dunno source, via our GraphJam builder. lol caption: aageek
Make your own using our Graph Builder or upload your own files, images or videos. All our charts are user-submitted.
« Previous Cell Phone Ringtones | Odds of dropping my cell phone Next »

What’s In The Living room of a house with a toddler
picture: dunno source, via our GraphJam builder. lol caption: aageek
There is nothing happy about this, KaBooM! (Although it IS funneh)
How would YOU like THAT to be YOUR living room?
Nvm that. Anyways, 5/4.
(4 cuz its not a graph.)
Second.
You forgot ‘decomposing food’ and ‘distressed pet’.
I think “unidentifiable sticky substance” covers those too (pun not originally intended).
And the frazzled mother, of course
Unidentifiable Sticky substance ?
Is it white ?
XD Win! On a fail graph.
Someone call 911, I think there’s a pedo living in that house.
A toddler came on all of his toys? Now that just CAN’T be right.
ohhh man that was a gooood laugh (SICK) but funny
Oh, c’mon. It’s supposed to be a Venn-diagram, not a map…
Yeah, This says most of the toys (along with parts of the couch) are an unidentifiable sticky substance.
There seems to be a lack of imagination in these comments…
Retarded homosexuals taking care of a baby? Who else could do this?
You obviously have never lived with a toddler. Everything is always covered in some unidentifiable sticky subtance. ie: jelly syrup or don’t even want to know….
It would appear that some parts of the couch are not only an unidentifiable sticky substance, but they are also a toy.
In fact, every toy is an unidentifiable sticky substance. 8\
Yeah, that would be about right…most toys are now fully unrecognizable due to the amout of *uss* residing on them. The last time I tried washing them was epic fail, so I gave up. When said toddler turns 5, I may consider purchasing new toys.
Yeah its cute idea, but for Venn purposes, it doesn’t make sense.
I have to disagree it makes complete sense for a parent with 3 boys between 7 and 2.
It makes absolute sense in a home with 2 boys, 2 dogs, a cat & an everchanging assortment of small caged pets (hamsters, guinea pigs, frogs…). Someday I’ll be able to walk shoeless without fear again….
The point isn’t whether the sentiment makes sense or not…It’s still not a graph, which, if I’m correct, is the object of GraphJam.
Contemporary observations in graph form, I believe is the idea … not ‘correct’ graphs that satisfy the anally retentive among us.
In which case, this is a win for anyone who has ever spent five minutes in a house inhabited by at least one toddler
And for those who are so obsessed with how ‘correct’ it is? I’d like to see a graph describing the contents of your butt, something like:
Fecal Matter: 10%
Gas: 2%
Skin: 14%
Various rods and possibly hamsters: 74%
I’m so sick of these baby/kids graphs.
Venn diagram FAIL.
Many people on this site don’t seem to know how to use Venn Diagrams.
Or they’re making them in a different way for the sake of humor. *rolls eyes*
It more than slightly defies the point of this being Graphjam though. Messing with graphs defeats the point more than slightly.
So, the overlaps between the toys are where the sticky substance has bonded them together permanently?
who knows…
When a toddler is involved? Who WANTS to know?
This same chart applies to a sorority girl’s bedroom.
o.O Um…this sticky substance on these “toys” is what, exactly?
LOL…my mind was going the same route there.
What “toys”, exactly?
Terrible, terrible understanding of how a Venn diagram works.
Wow. All you this-is-an-improper-usage-of-Venn-diagram people need to lighten up. Seriously.
Post is so true.
The idea of this site is to convey a fun or funny idea within the limited medium of graphs. If you’re not gonna use the graphs right then what’s the point? Might as well just take a picture of your living room and write sticky on everything.
Seriously? Get over yourself and develop a sense of humor! It’s funny- incorrect use of Venn diagram and all. Lighten up.
Mmmm. The whole point is that this is GraphJam. Funny things through the medium of graphs. Funny things through a corrupt mess that is a bastardisation of graphs it is not. The fun comes from the graph form anyway, the joke here is pretty poor in any standards.
*facepalm*
this is why i’m not having kids!
I agree! (Cue the “I’m so happy I had them anyway” responses!)
No, seriously, imagination or not, use the graph correctly. Yes, we’re being serious, because the focus is on the graph and not the content. Otherwise it’d be “pointing-out-stupid-thingsjam.com”
Ever thought that if these ‘incorrect uses’ upset you so much, you’re on the wrong site?
Why not start your own site, where you can censor those that don’t meet your standards?
Or better yet, get a life and/or a sense of humour!
ok so. it’s not a venn diagram. it’s hillarious. and it’s some other sort of diagram. it’s still a WIN.
I guess I picked the wrong post to start reading comments on… never again. Never again.
You got the gist of it.
ICHC is full of saccharine interplay, Pundit Kitchen is full of trolls, ROFLRazzi is full of of really good looking people who look down at Angelina Jolie, and GraphJam is full of anal-retentives.
So true
I should have just asked someone.
this graph is disgusting and inaccurate. how can a couch also be part of a toy!?
More like, which part of the couch is being used as a toy.
To a child, EVERYTHING is a toy
A wise man once told me, cleaning up after your children is like wiping before you are doing taking care of business…a bit disturbing but true.
LOL, I’ve never heard that one. Friends once told me “Cleaning up after a child is like shoveling the snow before the blizzard ends”.
So true.
Ah! A graph that is topical, timeless, mimicing an actual chid-infested living room, nice beat, easy to dance too… I give it a 17! Well done!
The folks that are complaining about the blatant misunderstanding of a Venn diagram aren’t being uptight, anal-retentive, or otherwise unreasonable. Nor are they kid haters. As has already been mentioned, this is a site about humor as conveyed through the narrow prism of graphs. The whole point is to be clever. How accurate the subject matter is has no relevance if you aren’t clever.
This is what the diagram should have looked like:
http://mine.icanhascheezburger.com/view.aspx?ciid=3304377
The point you’re missing is that your attempt is nether clever nor humorous
Agreed. However, I made no attempt to be either of those things.
nope…toys bubble needs to touch furniture bubble…but so close….
If you have furniture that is also considered a toy, then you could do that, yes.
You need to meet my toddler. The sofa is the greatest toy of all.
you obviously don’t have, or watch toddlers…
Not anymore, no. But I guess today’s toddlers are more (less?) sophisticated than yesterday’s.
With some proper colorization we could distinguish between the toys under the chair and sofa and those stuck under the cushions.
Too accurate to be funny 0_o
This graph is stupid.
Yet another opinion stated as fact *sigh*
Try “I think this graph is stupid” …
Monidon isn’t really a moron. He just doesn’t have any children yet.
The graph is brilliant! Good job thinking “outside the box,” too!
yeah, that pretty much covers it. (i has a toddler)
??????wtf???????that is disturbing yet probably unintentional…..u kno….. on and 4 the person who said distressed cat……..WHO THE HECK F**KS CATS!!!!!
THey also coulda titled this what’s in the dorm of a male college student
This one is one of the best I’ve seen. (I would argue that it is a graph. It’s obvious that there are two toys that are not completely covered by the stocky stuff. Okay, it may not be a true “graph” but it gets an A+ for creativity.) The only thing funnier is some of the comments people have left. (Hamster reference = ROTFL!) What we need is a new graph: Number of people who saw this graph that aren’t perverts = 5% (those would be the parents that have had toddlers and pets who didn’t get the wrong idea about “sticky substance”) and Number of people who saw this graph that ARE perverts = 95%
I know what the substance is. I call it Chemical DEWK, which stands for Don’t Even Want to Know.
umm they forgot the fingure printed TV and the broken handel off the entertainment center