Make your own using our Graph Builder or upload your own files, images or videos. All our charts are user-submitted.
« Previous Percent Chance of Seeing a Roach | Things That Solve Problems vs. Success Rate of Said Things Next »
Make your own using our Graph Builder or upload your own files, images or videos. All our charts are user-submitted.
« Previous Percent Chance of Seeing a Roach | Things That Solve Problems vs. Success Rate of Said Things Next »
It’s “for TEH lulz”.
{{{I replied to this post so this would be near the top}}}}}
I am, as are many of you, frustrated with he continued lameness of graphs lately. I have put “some” thought into the problem(s) and have come up with 2 core reasons:
1) Graphjam added that “GraphBuilder” which now allows anyone the opportunity to post something completely mediocre without any care in the world.
2) I reviewed a past number of really LAME graphs and have noticed that even though we all complain in the comments the graphs are still getting, for the most part, 3 or 4 stars caused by…
a) the original poster and all their friends initially voting it 5 stars and,
b) “Us” not taking the time to seriously give crap a 1 star rating.
In conclusion. Do your part PEOPLE. Call a spade a spade, or in this case, call a piece of S**T graph a piece of S**T graph. Stand Up! Be Counted! We cannot allow this to continue.
Thank you and Happy New Year
*applause*
I mean, even the name “JeezOPete” is waaay waaaay funnier than this graph. What, is my aunt Shirley approving these things now? She still thinks “… and the duck said ‘Just put it on my bill’! is a hilarious punchline.
Where’s the funny? Bring on the funny!
GraphJam is SERIOUS business you guys! This is SUCh a big deal!
I almost care more about the HORRIBLE spelling and grammar. Whatever happened to people caring whether or not they look like retards?
Preach it, brother!
The three most likely ones overlap a lot for me. Spite + fun = LULZ
A line graph?….
it burns!
He’s doing it wrong.
Boo!
Clearly he did this wrong for the lulz.
Also boredome. What’s that supposed to be, some dome where people go to be bored?
Borehole I’d understand.
Bordome? I think this belongs on Failblog as a spelling fail.
or Engrish?
The Bore Dome… I think that was one of the lecture halls at my old school.
I think it’s French. Bore-do-may. Translates to “proof-read fail”
Bio-dome without Pauly Shore?
Wouldn’t that be more like a “Win Dome”??
I think it’s more like Thunderdome. Everyone enters, and no one leaves because they’re bored to death.
there should be another reason, a very important reason, to get laid!!!!
How about “all for the nookie”? Then this would be a specimen of the endangered song-based graph, imago carmenis.
The quality of the posts here keeps getting worse and worse. It was better before the graph builder.
About three dozen people said that already, you festering turd.
You’re like a dog chasing a car… you wouldn’t know what to do with it if you caught it. You just DO things…
So when I say that what happened to you and your girlfriend was nothing personal, you know I’m telling the truth.
You had plans.. You were a schemer.. And look where that got you. I just did what I do best. I took your little plan, and I turned it on itself.
Introduce a little anarchy, upset the established order, and everything becomes chaos.
I’m an agent of chaos. And you know the thing about chaos? It’s fear.
I thought he said “fair”.
This is most probably the worst graph ever posted here. Seriously.
A line graph?
This got front page? An absolute new low.
should it be a bar graph?
I hate everything about this graph. It is the New Coke of graphs.
Do you get sick around it?
Can you not stand to be around it?
Or the Crystal Pepsi.
You forgot “Because a hot girl is watching”
WTF is up with that Donkeyshines ad? As your chances of being eaten by a bear increase, the number of T-shirts you own decreases? If I jump into the bear enclosure at the zoo, the T-shirt I am wearing will magically disappear?
It seems that even the advertisers here have picked up on the general quality of the graphs. They assume this is a site for unfunny graphs that make no sense, so they thought they’d fit in by creating one of their own.
No. The graph indicates that the less shirts you own, the greater chance you have of being eaten by a bear (we will not discuss the actual logic behind such a proffered statement). Basically, if you own less shirts, you’re more likely to be eaten by a bear and if you own more shirts, you’re less likely to be eaten. It’s a matter of probability.
You cannot own “less shirts” anyway. You can own “fewer shirts”. The word less is to be used to refer to smaller amounts of things which are typically measured by volume or weight, such as sugar, sand, water, etc. Fewer is to be used to describe a smaller amount of things which are counted by units, like shirts, bags, and apples.
??
Last I checked, sugar, sand, water, etc is measured in “units”.
No child. If you cannot tell whether something is measured in units or not, try saying “a” or “an” before it. An apple, vs a rice.
Get it now?
Less rice, fewer apples.
Wario approves of this graph.
Unfortunately, I am not Wario, and I do not think this graph is of even standard quality and is not appropriately designed. Though we understand it, it is not proper, and things done from BOREDOM should be much higher in this case, I am certain.
WHY DO PEOPLE ALWAYS SPELL BOREDOM WITH AN E AT THE END? I will never understand where this is coming from but I see it all the time!
I think we should petition to have this graph moved over to FailBlog. It’s only right. I mean, seriously, enough is enough.
hu lyk cairz??? go tell ur gf LOL!!
always for the lulz.