Make your own using our Graph Builder or upload your own files, images or videos. All our charts are user-submitted.
« Previous That quiet kid that everybody was afraid of in school | Word Problems in all Math Classes Next »
Incorrect source or offensive?

Haha, kind of true…
Oh look, my first first. My life’s greatest ambition accomplished.
Just get them a box of Legos, then they can smash it if they want.
I thought smashing aimlessly was pure entertainment.
Ah.. as opposed to smahing purposefully? Ah, ok, their both fun!
Yea it probably would have been better as a Venn diagram.
These n00bs just don’t get it.
1st FAIL – because it consist of the overdone “one small slice” and “one big slice” graph format.
2nd FAIL – “to smash aimlessly” can be included in the “to provide entertainment” subset, otherwise why would kids smash things if it doesn’t provide entertainment for them. Therefore a venn diagram would be more suitable.
Not really. I have a 6-year-old brother and his need for toys comes from:
- He thinks it’s fun (small slice)
- Other kids have it (large slice)
Or what they see on TV, or because they saw it in a toy store and they want things immediately or any of the infinite reasons kids want things. An oversimplification is rather contrived to produce a graph that is, by this point in time, rather cliche.
Are firecrackers included in the aimless smashing slice?
Yes there does need to be a slice for “Mercilessly advertised on TV”
You are the hieght of just-too-muchery.
I have two small children who are doing just that with their christmas toys in the living room as we speak, so I AND my headache are going to have to second and third that motion. ^_^
Ah, yes. My sisters favorite game to play with Barbie’s pink corvette. Add a coupl more slices you lazy prick!