A client can have their project _____:
Incorrect source or offensive?
You May Like:
Make your own using our Graph Builder or upload your own files, images or videos. All our charts are user-submitted.
« Previous Probability a Semi-Truck Will Be in the Lane Next to You on the Highway | Who my ex-girlfriend will date two days after we break-up Next »
My web design teacher always gave this comment to his clients when asked when and how much: “You can have it good, fast, or cheap, pick any two.”
Credo of any decent creative agency. We had it on the wall of the type/art/prepress joint I worked for years.
halo fan faggot
I actually downloaded a filter called the Ultimate Artist Aggravator that focuses on this concept…
Vaguely funny the first time but after that it’s just useless
Very well done.
Agreed! Aha! There’s the clever! I knew it was around here somewhere!
I wonder if “as a prototype and / or a publicity stunt” and ‘if they leave us alone and let us do our job” oughtn’t be switched? After all, publicity stunts and prototypes are usually lower quality (less good) and were “they [to] leave us alone and let us do our job”, wouldn’t the results be good?
Agreed.
Indeed
I was coming to post that same thing.
I had potatoes for lunch.
(less good) made me laugh
but i think that an agree is in order.
I suppose it could be. When I made the graph, though, I was remembering clients on short-lifecycle, low-budget projects. If they pester, then it’s inevitably late, breaking the “fast”. I also disagree with the logic that publicity stunts and prototypes are lower quality. Less complex, sure, but that is a different animal.
You swapped Good/Cheap and Fast/Cheap.
my name is ben, and I approve this pie chart
My name is Justin, and I approve this Venn Diagram.
My name is Peter, and I… PSYCH! PSYCH PSYCH!
My name is Bond…….James Bond.
“Any place, James.
Any time.”
Good+Cheap does not equal prototype, Fast+Cheap does.
Good+Cheap should be “if they leave us alone”
seconded
Some slight mistakes, but _finally_ some comedy around here…
lol agree^
Point taken. Quality, Price, Time. Can’t have all 3 optimally at once.
Welcome to my life. Great Diagram!
Just change “project” to “hooker”, and it’s completely inappropriate and good for a cheap laugh. Not that I know all about prostitution…*shifty eyes*
But this version is much more humorous. Well done.
This. Is total win. Lately I’ve been thinking about skipping over Graphjam because it’s so consistenly lame, lame, LAMEazoid, but this one is absolute win.
best venn in a while
I think it should be “When they show us a LOT of money”…
Yay, a clever and humurous chart! You may have just made it worth checking graphjam tomorrow!
I would swap the purple and the teal.
It works for sales too- we arrange and contract phone/internet bundles for businesses. It gets done faster when they’re not in the shop!
Oh noes! Impact!