Make your own using our Graph Builder or upload your own files, images or videos. All our charts are user-submitted.
« Previous leading cause of death, jack-o-lanterns | Likelihood of Complaining about the Government vs. Voting Habits Next »
Make your own using our Graph Builder or upload your own files, images or videos. All our charts are user-submitted.
« Previous leading cause of death, jack-o-lanterns | Likelihood of Complaining about the Government vs. Voting Habits Next »
Not the best, but I like it.
Excellent 3d-ness. Total abuse of that feature, but still awesome.
Don’t go see Quantum of Solace. I know this isn’t totally relevant, but it’s good advice regardless. I love you guys. I just don’t wanna see you get hurt.
Totally irrelevant actually.
mhm.
If someone ever read this comment, please let me know!
I read it. You can rest now.
OMG this is why i dont has catz… XD
Should that not be “Perspective of 3D Pie Charts”?
No, that would be nonsensical. It’s not about at what angle the charts are viewed; it’s about how people *perceive* them. “Unreadable” and “misleading” aren’t perspectives.
What I meant was that the perspective can make them unreadable, confusing and misleading (and cool) since changing the perspective can misrepresent the data your understanding of the data at first glance if you don’t look at the percentage score.
Apologies:
What I meant was that the perspective can make them unreadable, confusing and misleading (and cool) since changing the perspective can misrepresent [-del-] your understanding of the data at first glance if you don’t look at the percentage score.
Ah, but are Confusing, Misleading, and Unreadable really distinct categories? I submit they are not.
Maybe not, but they are different words.
Not that that has anything to do with it. I’m just a fan of pointing out the excruciatingly obvious.
I think this is pretty good. Best use of a 3D pie chart I’ve seen!
You’re really good at it, too.
That just contributes to this particular 3D pie chart being confusing, misleading, and unreadable.
Which was the point.
It’s ok. Not everyone understands meta-humor on the first try.
aah meta-humour, gotta love it
Misleading and Unreadable should be switched
I’m confused and possibly mislead. It appears that cool is the majority but it says only 30%. Or am I not reading it correctly?
It’s the angle. That’s also why it’s misleading.
You just failed at meta-meta-humour
i jus became the noo pres. Can I offr u a job in government?
Look how cool that chart is!
lol, that is soo true. funny
ill use it
I would hit it.