Make your own using our Graph Builder or upload your own files, images or videos. All our charts are user-submitted.
« Previous Complexity of Credit Crunch Explanations | Movie twists Next »
Make your own using our Graph Builder or upload your own files, images or videos. All our charts are user-submitted.
« Previous Complexity of Credit Crunch Explanations | Movie twists Next »
Sweet!!!! I made it!!!
spelling fail
what’s misspelled?
“Perceived.”
Also, methinks a bar graph would’ve been more appropriate…. and that this one spreads dirty lies.
How would a bar graph have been better. It’s a percentage.
And as far as the colors, this is my first one and I didn’t figure out how tochange the colors. Those are the default setting.
And yes. TV shows in the 1980’s sucked. Got back and watch Thundercats again and then tell me you still think it’s awesome.
Hey, Thundercats is awesome.
Now many of the other popular shows in the 80s sucked though.
Magnum PI rocked, especially the cross-over with the Simon & Simon brothers.
Dude! You could have picked any show and it would probably suck. But Thudercats? Thundercats was a seriously tight show. Of all the shows, you down on one of the good ones. I suppose you’re going to say that Alyssa Milano wasn’t hot either!
Thundercats sucked balls, as did their lamer cousins Tigersharks and Silverhawks. It was formulaic as all hell, the voice talent was mediocre at best, and the plots had more holes than a block of swiss cheese. And for some reason, they figured that adding carbon copies of the main characters a few seasons in was worth doing. And don’t even get me started on Snarf. Not since Orko was there a greater waste of animation.
Transformers and GI Joe were the only decent 80’s non-anime toons.
Yep. I liked the show a lot, but I can’t argue with someone as smart as you. You must be like — a god where you come from. I mean…dropping names like Orko and Snarf… what was I think. Forgive me. Please don’t strike me down with your plastic light sabre or your Spongebob lunch box.
Interesting response. I guess you’ve got nothing, then?
Actual and Perceived would only need to be compared to each other, but not to the sum of the two. Unless you’re trying to say that only 4% of the perceived awesomeness is actually there.
And I thought you meant sitcoms and other live-action TV.
Seriously! The spelling and grammar mistakes on these chart and graph jokes are making me sick. Learn to proofread, geektards.
Hey…Cherry, you better calm down before you pop!
Oops! not again!
While it’s a different topic, this graph looks almost exactly like the last one. Admin and originality fail.
Template revision fail, at the very least.
I think it’s right on. Don’t worry, I’m not good at spelling either. I would have spelled it the same way.
spelling nazis everywhere.
but yeah, shows in the 80s always seemed so much better until you start watching old reruns and you realize “oh wait…this wasnt that funny”
I disagree!
Hm… shouldn’t this be the other way around? ;-P
Bar graph instead?
Don’t diss the 80’s! The Young Ones, Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy (the proper tv show and not the totally lame film) ….. The Bill started in the 80’s and there was TISWAS! I mean tv doesn’t come much better than that.
And Thundercats was brilliant!
Oh yeah Naruto is SO much better than Thundercats. And King of Queens is timeless; Cheers was a joke, right.
Airwolf ruled over all. Except the last season. (shudders)
Couldn’t it be said that awesomeness is relative? In which case, all awesomeness would be perceived.