Comments on: Effect of parking lot occupancy on vehicle speed

By: Tickle My Elmo

Tickle My Elmo — Tue, 13 Jan 2009 05:06:06 +0000

I think all three lol

By: Roflberry McLovin

Roflberry McLovin — Thu, 09 Oct 2008 15:46:02 +0000

Now do one like that showing the parabola described by fresh snow on the parking lot, given the same speed =D

By: manda banda

manda banda — Wed, 01 Oct 2008 15:37:35 +0000

Hey dingbat – I meant the speed increase thing, not the lines. Besides my Target’s lines are yellow.

And yes, namecalling makes me feel better.

By: !null

!null — Wed, 01 Oct 2008 02:27:35 +0000

Exactly! It makes perfect sense.
The only thing wrong with the graph is that it makes the assumption that left to right equals less to more occupancy, and that bottom to top equals slower to faster.
But that’s forgivable because that’s how one would expect it to go.

It’s probably just confusing people because the illustration of the car is driving in the opposite “direction” from what one would expect from a graph.

But there’s definitely nothing wrong with it. I like it.

By: !null

!null — Wed, 01 Oct 2008 02:23:37 +0000

How exactly do you propose that vehicle speed affects occupancy? It makes way more sense the way it already is.

By: !null

!null — Wed, 01 Oct 2008 02:22:38 +0000

Oh my god! Parking lots in my area tend to be painted with white lines and arranged into lanes too!

By: ClickClickNow

ClickClickNow — Tue, 30 Sep 2008 10:15:19 +0000

Oh, geeze, my Target, too!

By: davidhildreth

davidhildreth — Tue, 30 Sep 2008 06:12:12 +0000

These get better all the time, great job!

By: frigginrandom.com

frigginrandom.com — Tue, 30 Sep 2008 02:07:34 +0000

88mph can be reached but my flux capacitor is BUSTED.

By: ClickClickNow

ClickClickNow — Tue, 30 Sep 2008 00:10:27 +0000

I’m not going to confess to driving like this. But the graph is great!

By: BC girl- Jen

BC girl- Jen — Mon, 29 Sep 2008 21:54:07 +0000

lol thanks mars. I still think the graph is done wrong. Or its just really hard to read…. Or I took an extra dose of retard pills today.

By: mars

mars — Mon, 29 Sep 2008 21:52:48 +0000

Shut up Stinkey Head! >:(

By: hh

hh — Mon, 29 Sep 2008 21:14:05 +0000

clever

By: manda banda

manda banda — Mon, 29 Sep 2008 20:14:10 +0000

OMG! Do you go to the Target in my town?? This is a perfect graph for that parking lot!

By: Vernie

Vernie — Mon, 29 Sep 2008 19:47:45 +0000

Brilliant! I love it; very witty.

By: siriochan

siriochan — Mon, 29 Sep 2008 19:41:37 +0000

Nice one!

By: Stereotypo

Stereotypo — Mon, 29 Sep 2008 18:56:15 +0000

Nope, you’re just stupid.

By: Bio-Rad

Bio-Rad — Mon, 29 Sep 2008 18:35:56 +0000

What happened to 88 mph?

Great Scott!

By: Lolnathan

Lolnathan — Mon, 29 Sep 2008 18:02:12 +0000

Empty parking lots increase my speed by 15mph against my will.

By: Mikey

Mikey — Mon, 29 Sep 2008 17:58:51 +0000

No, this makes sense… inventive graph too… the fewer the cars in the lot, the faster you will go, and more likely you are to drive across lanes, as illustrated

By: ummm

ummm — Mon, 29 Sep 2008 17:43:22 +0000

Shouldn’t the axes be switched? Effect of vehicle speed on parking lot occupancy

By: BC girl- Jen

BC girl- Jen — Mon, 29 Sep 2008 17:22:35 +0000

WTF?? Did I miss something here….??!?