Comments on: Jay-Z http://graphjam.com/2008/04/01/funny-graphs-jay-z-99-problems-bar/ Explaining music, songs and pop culture in charts and graphs. AKA music/song chart memes and funny graphs. Sat, 20 Mar 2010 19:14:00 +0000 http://wordpress.com/ hourly 1 By: chuck http://graphjam.com/2008/04/01/funny-graphs-jay-z-99-problems-bar/comment-page-1/#comment-62669 chuck Sat, 18 Jul 2009 02:46:41 +0000 http://graphjam.com/?p=237#comment-62669 I'd mark the categories "bitches" and "other" I’d mark the categories “bitches” and “other”

]]> By: kentyman http://graphjam.com/2008/04/01/funny-graphs-jay-z-99-problems-bar/comment-page-1/#comment-1384 kentyman Tue, 06 May 2008 15:39:43 +0000 http://graphjam.com/?p=237#comment-1384 I always thought it was funny that he's bragging about having all these problems <i>and</i> he's lonely. I always thought it was funny that he’s bragging about having all these problems and he’s lonely.

]]> By: Jay-Z http://graphjam.com/2008/04/01/funny-graphs-jay-z-99-problems-bar/comment-page-1/#comment-741 Jay-Z Wed, 16 Apr 2008 21:33:42 +0000 http://graphjam.com/?p=237#comment-741 ...make that "statistical accuracy." Looks like writing is another problem for the the Jigga Man. So please excuse me, I'm a change clothes and go. …make that “statistical accuracy.” Looks like writing is another problem for the the Jigga Man. So please excuse me, I’m a change clothes and go.

]]> By: Jay-Z http://graphjam.com/2008/04/01/funny-graphs-jay-z-99-problems-bar/comment-page-1/#comment-740 Jay-Z Wed, 16 Apr 2008 21:23:02 +0000 http://graphjam.com/?p=237#comment-740 Hi, I'm Jay-Z, and I approve this graph (non-statistical accuracy is one of my problems). Hi, I’m Jay-Z, and I approve this graph (non-statistical accuracy is one of my problems).

]]> By: R http://graphjam.com/2008/04/01/funny-graphs-jay-z-99-problems-bar/comment-page-1/#comment-536 R Thu, 10 Apr 2008 00:19:59 +0000 http://graphjam.com/?p=237#comment-536 maybe JW is with the Bureau of Statistics and needs to make this official. In any case, this is gold. Simple and funny. maybe JW is with the Bureau of Statistics and needs to make this official. In any case, this is gold. Simple and funny.

]]> By: Dagonet http://graphjam.com/2008/04/01/funny-graphs-jay-z-99-problems-bar/comment-page-1/#comment-237 Dagonet Fri, 04 Apr 2008 09:16:58 +0000 http://graphjam.com/?p=237#comment-237 We could rename "Problems" with "Other" so the two bars are subsets of a larger "Problems"-set. We could rename “Problems” with “Other” so the two bars are subsets of a larger “Problems”-set.

]]> By: Grace http://graphjam.com/2008/04/01/funny-graphs-jay-z-99-problems-bar/comment-page-1/#comment-223 Grace Fri, 04 Apr 2008 02:22:00 +0000 http://graphjam.com/?p=237#comment-223 It took me forever to figure out how to make that graph and I don't claim for it to be mathematically/scientifically accurate. Glad the rest of you guys like it :-) It took me forever to figure out how to make that graph and I don’t claim for it to be mathematically/scientifically accurate.
Glad the rest of you guys like it :-)

]]> By: RoPiNi http://graphjam.com/2008/04/01/funny-graphs-jay-z-99-problems-bar/comment-page-1/#comment-177 RoPiNi Wed, 02 Apr 2008 14:26:36 +0000 http://graphjam.com/?p=237#comment-177 Love it. Even if the logic isn't perfect. I've got 99 problems too, but mine are in hex. Love it. Even if the logic isn’t perfect.

I’ve got 99 problems too, but mine are in hex.

]]> By: Kid Robot http://graphjam.com/2008/04/01/funny-graphs-jay-z-99-problems-bar/comment-page-1/#comment-160 Kid Robot Tue, 01 Apr 2008 20:14:18 +0000 http://graphjam.com/?p=237#comment-160 Favourite graph. Favourite graph.

]]> By: JW http://graphjam.com/2008/04/01/funny-graphs-jay-z-99-problems-bar/comment-page-1/#comment-154 JW Tue, 01 Apr 2008 19:22:15 +0000 http://graphjam.com/?p=237#comment-154 Shouldn't "Bitch-Related Problems" be a potential (and in this case, non-existant) subset of "Problems"? If B-R Problems are > 0 then it effects the overall number of problems, whereas here they look to be mutually exclusive. Shouldn’t “Bitch-Related Problems” be a potential (and in this case, non-existant) subset of “Problems”? If B-R Problems are > 0 then it effects the overall number of problems, whereas here they look to be mutually exclusive.

]]>