Make your own using our Graph Builder or upload your own files, images or videos. All our charts are user-submitted.
« Previous Hokey Pokey | Problem Solving Flowchart Next »
Make your own using our Graph Builder or upload your own files, images or videos. All our charts are user-submitted.
« Previous Hokey Pokey | Problem Solving Flowchart Next »
Shouldn’t “Bitch-Related Problems” be a potential (and in this case, non-existant) subset of “Problems”? If B-R Problems are > 0 then it effects the overall number of problems, whereas here they look to be mutually exclusive.
Favourite graph.
Love it. Even if the logic isn’t perfect.
I’ve got 99 problems too, but mine are in hex.
HEY JW
SHUT THE FUCK UP!
It took me forever to figure out how to make that graph and I don’t claim for it to be mathematically/scientifically accurate.
Glad the rest of you guys like it
We could rename “Problems” with “Other” so the two bars are subsets of a larger “Problems”-set.
maybe JW is with the Bureau of Statistics and needs to make this official. In any case, this is gold. Simple and funny.
Hi, I’m Jay-Z, and I approve this graph (non-statistical accuracy is one of my problems).
…make that “statistical accuracy.” Looks like writing is another problem for the the Jigga Man. So please excuse me, I’m a change clothes and go.
I always thought it was funny that he’s bragging about having all these problems and he’s lonely.
I’d mark the categories “bitches” and “other”